Should capital Punishment be abolished?

“Capital punishment is the lawful infliction of death as a punishment and since ancient times it has been used for a wide variety of offences. Reform of the death penalty began in Europe by the 1750’s and was championed by academics the French philosopher and the English law reformers and Jeremy Bentham. Along with Quaker leaders and other social reformers, they defended life imprisonment as a more rational alternative.” By the 1850’s, Venezuela (1853) and Portugal (1867) were the first nations to abolish the death penalty altogether. In the United States, Michigan was the first state to abolish it for murder in 1847. Today, it is virtually abolished in all of Western Europe and most of Latin America. Britain effectively abolished capital punishment in 1965. But the USA, together with China, Japan and many Asian and Middle Eastern countries, plus some African states still retain the death penalty for certain crimes and impose it with varying frequency. Someone killed a person, he have to response for what did he do. The capital punishment should be executed, because of the incapacitation of the criminal, cost and deterrence.      
       
“Capital punishment permanently removes the worst criminals from society and should prove much safer for the rest of us than long term or permanent incarceration. It is self evident that dead criminals cannot commit any further crimes, either within prison or after escaping or after being released from it.” According Home Office figures show the rates for unlawful killings in Britain have more than doubled since abolition of capital punishment in 1964 from 0.68 per 100,000 of the population to 1 .42 per 100,000. In addition, there were 57 in 1965 – the first year of abolition. Ten years later the total for the year was 107 which rose to 173 by 1985 and 214 in 1995. The crime rate is increase quickly in Britain after they canceled the death penalty; therefore the capital punishment should be executed.     
     
Money is not an inexhaustible commodity and the government may very well better spend our resources on the old, the young and the sick, rather than on the long term imprisonment of murderers, rapists, Anti-capital punishment campaigners in the U.S. cite the higher cost of executing someone over life in prison, but this, whilst true for America, “has to do with the endless appeals and delays in carrying out death sentences that are allowed under the U.S. legal system where the average time spent on death row is over 12 years.” If they use the money to help people who need help, this will be better. Therefore the capital punishment should not be prohibiting.     
       
It is hard to prove whether the death penalty deter, because in most retentions countries compared between the numbers of people actually executed per year and those sentenced to death is usually a very small part. However, seem that in those countries such as Singapore which almost always carry out death sentences, there is far less serious crime. “This tends to indicate that the death penalty is a deterrent, but only where execution is a virtual certainty.  The death penalty is much more likely to be a deterrent where the crime requires planning and the potential criminal has time to think about the possible consequences. Where the crime is committed in the heat of the moment there is no likelihood that any punishment will act as a deterrent.” According to the survey, in 1995, Singapore hanged an unusually large number of 7 murderers with 4 in 1996, 3 in 1997 and only one in 1998 rising to 6 in 1999. Singapore takes an equally hard line on all other forms of crime with stiff on the spot fines for trivial offences such as dropping litter, caning for males between 18 and 50 for a wide variety of offences, and rigorous imprisonment for all serious crimes. That improved the death penalty deter, so it is feasible.     
     
Imposition of capital punishment would not cause the violation of human rights. Instead it would protect the wider range of human-rights violations by protecting the lives of many innocents, use the money to help more people and decrease the crime rate.
Reference:
http://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/thoughts.html#Ali
http://ezinearticles.com/?Should-Capital-Punishment-Be-Abolished&id=329831